What the Measure Does
The "2026 Billionaire Tax Act" (Initiative 25-0024) would impose a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of California residents with assets exceeding $1 billion as of January 1, 2026. The tax applies to worldwide assets, not just California-based holdings.
Critically, the measure applies retroactively. This means billionaires would owe 5% of their net worth as of January 1, 2026, even if the measure passes later in the year or if they have already established residency in another state.
Proponents estimate the tax would generate approximately $100 billion in revenue. However, this estimate assumes no capital flight, stable markets, and successful collection from individuals who have already left the state—all questionable assumptions given current evidence.
The measure requires 874,641 valid signatures to qualify for the November 2026 ballot. Signature gathering is currently underway across California, with a deadline of June 24, 2026.
⚠️ The retroactive nature of this tax means individuals who relocate before the measure passes could still be liable for taxes on wealth they held while California residents, creating significant legal and constitutional questions.
Critical Policy Concerns
Capital Flight
Wealth taxes consistently drive high-net-worth individuals to relocate. Research from the OECD shows that countries with wealth taxes experience significant outmigration of taxable individuals, permanently reducing the tax base.
California is already experiencing this: Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, along with Peter Thiel, have relocated their tax residency out of state.
Revenue Volatility
Wealth taxes create extreme revenue volatility because they tax net worth, which fluctuates dramatically with market conditions. A 20% market correction can eliminate billions in projected revenue, creating budget crises. The Legislative Analyst's Office estimates California already faces a structural deficit of $20–$35 billion annually through 2027-28.
The top 1% of taxpayers contribute nearly 40–50% of the state's personal income tax revenue. If they flee, the fiscal crater will dwarf any wealth tax revenue collected.
Constitutional Vulnerabilities
The retroactive nature of the tax and its attempt to tax individuals who have left the state raise serious constitutional questions under the Due Process Clause, the Commerce Clause, and Supreme Court precedent in Saenz v. Roe.
Legal challenges could tie up revenue for years while costing taxpayers millions in litigation.
Administrative Burden
Valuing illiquid assets like private companies, art collections, and real estate holdings is complex, expensive, and subject to extensive litigation. Administrative costs can consume 15-30% of revenue collected.
California would need to create an entirely new bureaucracy to value and audit billionaire assets.
Economic Impact
Wealth taxes reduce investment, entrepreneurship, and job creation. When billionaires relocate, they take their businesses, investments, and philanthropic activities with them, reducing economic activity and tax revenue from other sources.
International Failures
Twelve European countries implemented wealth taxes between 1990 and 2017. Eight have since repealed them, including France (2017), Sweden (2007), and Germany (1997), due to capital flight, low revenue yields, and administrative complexity.
No major economy has successfully maintained a wealth tax long-term.
Constitutional & Legal Vulnerabilities
Saenz v. Roe (1999)
The U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed the fundamental right of citizens to move between states without penalty. In Saenz v. Roe, the Court held that the Privileges and Immunities Clause protects the right to travel and establish residency in any state.
Attempting to tax individuals after they have left California may violate this constitutional right, as it effectively penalizes interstate migration.
Due Process & Retroactivity
The Due Process Clause requires fair notice before imposing tax obligations. Retroactive taxation of past residency for a tax that didn't exist at the time violates the principle of fair notice, creating significant legal risk.
Courts have consistently struck down retroactive taxes that lack a rational basis or violate fundamental fairness principles.
Dormant Commerce Clause
The measure taxes worldwide assets, not just California-based holdings. This creates potential violations of the Dormant Commerce Clause, which prohibits states from unduly burdening interstate commerce or discriminating against out-of-state economic activity.
Taxing assets located outside California may exceed the state's taxing authority and violate constitutional limits on state power.
Enforcement Challenges
Attempting to collect taxes from individuals who have left the state and established residency elsewhere would require complex interstate enforcement mechanisms, potentially violating the Full Faith and Credit Clause and creating years of litigation.
The state may be unable to collect from relocated billionaires, making revenue projections unreliable.
The Bottom Line
Multiple constitutional challenges could tie up this tax in courts for years, preventing any revenue collection while costing California taxpayers millions in legal fees. Even if the tax survives legal challenges, collection from individuals who have already left the state may prove impossible.
Economic Impact Analysis
Revenue Projections vs. Reality
Proponents' Estimate
$100 Billion
Assumes: No capital flight, stable markets, successful collection from relocated individuals
Realistic Assessment
$20-40 Billion
Accounts for: Capital flight (Page, Brin, Thiel already exited), market volatility (-20% correction erases revenue), administrative costs (15-30% of revenue), collection difficulties
The Structural Deficit Reality
The LAO estimates California already faces a structural deficit of $20–$35 billion annually through 2027-28. The top 1% contribute nearly 40–50% of the state's personal income tax revenue. If they flee, the fiscal crater will be catastrophic.
Unintended Economic Consequences
Reduced Investment
Wealth taxes reduce the after-tax return on investments, discouraging capital formation and reducing economic growth. Studies show wealth taxes can reduce GDP growth by 0.2-0.3 percentage points annually.
Job Losses
When billionaires relocate, they take their businesses and investments with them. This reduces employment opportunities, particularly in high-paying sectors like technology, finance, and venture capital.
Lost Tax Revenue
Relocated billionaires no longer pay California income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, or contribute to the state's economy. The lost revenue from other taxes may exceed the wealth tax revenue collected.
Innovation Impact
California's innovation economy depends on venture capital and entrepreneurial risk-taking. Wealth taxes reduce both, potentially harming the state's competitive advantage in technology and innovation.
The "Doom Loop" Precedent
San Francisco's Warning
In 2024, San Francisco voters passed Proposition M, which repealed the city's punitive "Overpaid Executive Tax." Even the most progressive electorate in the nation rejected symbolic inequality taxes when linked to economic degradation—empty storefronts, a budget deficit threatening public transit and sanitation, and businesses fleeing to Austin and Miami.
Initiative 25-0024 risks creating the same "Doom Loop" statewide: capital flight reduces the tax base, which forces spending cuts or new middle-class taxes, which drives more residents and businesses out. The Legislative Analyst's Office has explicitly warned that structural deficits require ongoing solutions, not one-time fixes, and that reliance on volatile revenue sources exacerbates the state's fiscal fragility.
⚠️ The "Budget Trap": Using a one-time wealth tax to fund permanent entitlement expansions (healthcare) guarantees a fiscal cliff when the money runs out—or when the wealth base flees.
Five Competing "Foe" Initiatives
Five competing ballot initiatives have been filed that could directly conflict with or neutralize the Billionaire Tax Act. Under the California Constitution, if conflicting measures both pass, the one with the higher vote count prevails.
Taxpayer Protection & Govt Accountability Act
Requires any new tax increasing revenue by $10B+ to pass both the legislature AND a statewide vote—making Initiative 25-0024 invalid as a standalone measure.
Govt Spending Limitation Act
Caps state spending growth, making it illegal to spend the revenue the tax would generate without offsetting cuts elsewhere.
Economic Competitiveness Act
Requires an economic impact analysis before any tax that could cause "substantial capital outmigration." This directly targets the wealth tax.
Govt Efficiency Improvement Act
Prohibits new "special taxes" unless the recipient entity eliminates lowest-performing programs—Initiative 25-0024 lacks this requirement.
Retirement & Savings Protection Act
Prohibits taxes on the "ownership or accumulation" of assets—a direct constitutional ban on the base of the billionaire tax.
Source: Pillsbury Law, SeeSALT Blog
Timeline
October 22, 2025
INITIATIVE FILED
Initiative 25-0024 ("2026 Billionaire Tax Act") filed by Jim Mangia and Suzanne Jimenez of SEIU-UHW.
November 26, 2025
AMENDMENT FILED
Amendment filed to shift the effective date from 2025 to 2026 to mitigate legal challenges regarding retroactivity.
December 2025
HIGH-PROFILE EXITS
Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Peter Thiel exit California residency. Larry Page purchases $173 million in Miami real estate, signaling permanent departure. This represents hundreds of billions in wealth leaving the state.
December 26, 2025
CLEARED FOR SIGNATURES
Initiative cleared for signature gathering by the Secretary of State.
January 2026
CURRENT STATUS: SIGNATURE GATHERING
Signature gathering phase begins. Proponents need 874,641 valid signatures (for Constitutional Amendment) to qualify. Governor Newsom publicly opposes the measure, calling it bad policy that threatens California's innovation economy. Capital flight continues as more billionaires relocate. Five competing "foe" ballot initiatives are filed.
February 18, 2026
BERNIE SANDERS RALLY — LOS ANGELES
Proponents mobilize with a major rally in Los Angeles featuring Senator Bernie Sanders to build support for the measure. This represents a significant escalation in the campaign to qualify the initiative for the ballot.
April 17, 2026
RECOMMENDED DEADLINE
Recommended deadline for submitting signatures for random sample verification.
June 25, 2026
FINAL DEADLINE
Final deadline for signature verification.
July 2026
BALLOT CERTIFICATION
Secretary of State certifies measure for the November ballot (if sufficient signatures are verified).
November 3, 2026
GENERAL ELECTION
California voters decide whether to impose the tax. By this point, significant capital flight may have already occurred, reducing the potential tax base.
News Coverage
Recent Articles
Gavin Newsom Comes Out Swinging Against California Billionaire Tax
Governor Newsom publicly opposes the measure, warning it threatens California's innovation economy and could trigger a capital flight "doom loop."
The Fight Over How to Pay for Medi-Cal Puts Pressure on Newsom to Raise Taxes
SEIU-UHW frames the wealth tax as a moral imperative to backfill federal cuts to Medi-Cal and SNAP, while opposition warns of the "Budget Trap."
Tech Titans Divided Over Whether to Pay Billionaire Tax or Flee
Silicon Valley is split as some tech leaders consider paying while others accelerate relocation plans to no-income-tax states.
Google Founders and California's Wealth Tax Proposal
Coverage of how Google co-founders and other tech billionaires are responding to California's proposed billionaire tax initiative.
Democratic Mayor of San Jose Opposes Billionaire Tax
San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, a Democrat, has come out against the proposed ballot measure, warning it could harm California's innovation economy.
Newsom Dings Labor Leader, Dismisses Wealth Tax Push
Governor Newsom's response to the wealth tax initiative and his stance on the labor union's push for the measure.
Sergey Brin Joins Larry Page in Cutting California Ties Ahead of Billionaire Tax
Google co-founder Sergey Brin joins Larry Page in relocating business entities out of California as the wealth tax proposal gains momentum.
California Wealth Tax Threat Pushes Billionaires to Texas, Florida
Analysis of the accelerating billionaire exodus from California as the proposed wealth tax drives relocation to tax-friendly states.
San Jose Mayor Calls California's Proposed Billionaire Wealth Tax an "Incredible Risk"
San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan warns that the proposed billionaire tax poses significant risks to California's economy and innovation sector.
California Billionaire Exodus Accelerates as Newsom Pushes 5% Wealth Tax
Video coverage of the accelerating billionaire exodus from California as the proposed wealth tax sparks backlash and migration to red states.
Stay Up To Date
Get the latest updates on California's 2026 Billionaire Tax proposal, signature gathering progress, policy developments, and opportunities to get involved. We'll keep you informed without overwhelming your inbox.
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.